#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac how to
#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac for mac
#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac install
#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac full
#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac code

A better name would've helped avoid confusion ( something that frustrated devs from the moment it launched), but MS has had a rough history of finding good names for products.Home › News › Its time to say goodbye to Microsoft.

#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac full

I think the most frustrating thing is that this app, which is really a rebranded Xamarin Studio, is marketed like it's the full Visual Studio IDE ported from Windows to Mac.

#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac code

Realizing your only option is to compile from source code makes you take a long, hard look at how badly you need to test a piece of code. I found at least one workaround but it seems to be for MonoDevelop only, not Visual Studio. NET profiles on Mono, there's no need to recompile them (they’ll just run on the. Note: You can still run assemblies compiled for earlier. NET 4.5 assemblies as well as the mobile-based profiles. NET 4.0 APIs, we now ship binaries of the reference assemblies (API contracts, without any actual executable code in them). We no longer build the reference assemblies for the. Or why the MonoDevelop team decided to drop support for devs writing apps in a corporate environment, where only an older version of. or why there's an available selection for the. Although I don't know why the 2.x and 3.x versions of Mono don't work then. or just use Windows.Īfter doing some more research, I found release notes for MonoDevelop 4.0.0 that corraborated what he said. I can only assume he means I should compile the MonoDevelop source code.

#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac how to

I replied asking for any other hints or tips on how to do that, but haven't heard back yet. There's no need to 'Visual Studio' all the things. In other words, the marketing team should've probably thought a little longer about how to brand this. NET 3.5 and 4.5 or something similar, I suggest installing very old Mono or even better do it on Windows with. So warning is valid and intended, hence closing this as not a bug. Mono by design only supports latest versions of. A few days later, it was closed with this response from a Microsoft employee: Thank you for your feedback! We have determined that this issue is not a bug. Getting official helpĪfter awhile, I opened a ticket in the developer community forums with all the details above, including what I'd tried. Afterwards, I tried different combinations of Mono release (Project / Active Runtime) to. I downloaded the last release for 2.x, 3.x, etc and installed them all.

#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac install

NET Framework was out when it was released, and I needed to install them? Sure, just a guess, but it seemed logical. Okay, so maybe each Mono version supports whatever version of the. NET Runtimes tab in preferences, all I had was Mono 5. I even tried committing the project to git before this happened so I could restore it, but it showed no changes, so whatever got borked must've been in some hidden file. Once you start doing anything remotely interesting though.Įven after restarting (and reinstalling) VS4Mac, that project appeared to be permanently hosed, and I had to create a new one. it works okay as long as you stay in the lines. This is fairly typical of my experience in VS4Mac.

NET alternated between showing an error in the console when I tried to run my tiny app: WARNING: The runtime version supported by this application is unavailable.Īnd sometimes the IDE blew up completely by underlining everything and claiming it could no longer find System.Object or System.Int32. However, switching to an earlier version of. You can right-click a project and choose options to find a dropdown under the 'Build' settings, which is very similar to Visual Studio on Windows. NET, which seemed as if it were going to be trivial. So I spent a few evenings trying to target a C# project for an earlier version of. NET values backwards compatibility, but it's not unheard of. That'd actually be pretty unusual, since.

#Microsoft .net framework 4.6 for mac for mac

I thought I'd setup a local project in Visual Studio for Mac and then turn the clock back a bit to see if maybe how the code was implemented changed between. I saw an implementation of some C# code this week that looked like it should work, but wasn't producing the expected results for me using.